QUESTION $1$

The PROACT method recommends that you reexamine your problem statement as you go

through the subsequent steps

True

False

$3$ points

QUESTION $2$

When generating alternatives it is generally beneficial to challenge constraints.

True

False

$3$ points

QUESTION $3$

When generating alternatives, it is generally recommended to evaluate altematives as you go and

eliminate poor alternatives along the way

True

False

$3$ points

QUESTION $4$

The terms "attribute" is similar to and often used as a synonym for $(......).($check all that apply$)$

a$.$ alternative

b$.$ tradeoff

c$.$ criteria

d$.$ importance weight

e$.$ objective

f$.$ feature

g$.$ solution

h$.$ option

i$.$ probability

j$.$ uncertainty

k$.$ consequence

l$.$ characteristic

$25$ points

QUESTION $5$

Even swaps:

a$.$ involves assessing the rate of substitution between attributes

b$.$ involves normalizing different units of evaluation to a common range

c$.$ prioritizes alternatives based on numerical importance weights

d$.$ requires converting qualitative scores into quantitative scores

e$.$ is a technique for identifying better alternatives

QUESTION $6$

Dominated alternatives are superior to or tied with other alternatives on all attributes.

True

False

$3$ points

QUESTION $7$

If all alternatives are equal $($tied$)$ on an attribute, that attribute can be dropped from the analysis

True

False

$3$ points

QUESTION $8$

Ranking $($e$.$g$.,1=$ best to $n=$ worst$)$ is generally considered to be more precise than rating $($e$.$g$.,$

from $1=$ worst to $10=$ best$)$

True

False

QUESTION $9$

$3$ points

In Benjamin Franklin's "moral or prud

are considered with the precision of

$1$ of $3$

True

False

QUESTION $10$