QUESTION 10 Part III Answer All Case 1: On September 20, 2021, Carol was hired as a Senior Teller/Customer Service Representative by Community Banks and stuff owned bank located in Hope, AR, employing 18 full-time and part-time employees. During her job interview, Carol was a model of conservatism, waarin dem and a gray woman's business suit. Her education and experience were rated excellent and she appeared just right for the job. She was tired on the Four working days later, she arrived at the bank in blue jeans, Birkenstock shoes, and a lose fitting sweatshirt with a Nancy Pelosi image on it Susan, the branch manager, told Carol that Community Bank female employees were expected to wear appropriate attire women's business sults, jewelry makeup and a white blouse with red ties. (Only men are permitted to wear casual clothing to work Carol was then told to go home immediately and change into something more appropriate. Carol refused claiming this rule restricted her night to equal protection under Title VII. She was promptly fired for disobeying the dress code. Carol immediately filed an EEC complaint claiming that she is being sexual harassed a. Can the complaining party establish a prima facie case under Title VW Why you must justify your answer based on your knowledge of laws 4 points) b. If so, Identify the type (ie, disparate impact, disparate treatment sexual harassment, mixed motive, etc.). 3 points) c. Based only on the information provided, who will prevail-the respondent or the complaining party? Why? (3 points) For the toolbar, press ALTF10 Pr ALT F. Mact