Question 11 (4 points)

Saved

When Adam was 21-years-old, he entered the U.S. on an employment visa and adjusted his status to that of a lawful permanent resident. When Adam was 23-years-old, he returned to his country of citizenship because his father had been involved in a serious accident. Over the next 18 months, Adam nursed his father back to health. When Adam was still 24-years-old, he returned to his job in the U.S. When Adam was 27-years-old, he applied for naturalization. What is a likely result with Adam's naturalization application?

Question 11 options:

a)	Adam's application for naturalization will likely be approved because he has the requisite time as an LPR.

b)	Adam's application for naturalization will likely be approved because he was lawfully admitted to the U.S.

c)	Adam's application for naturalization will likely be denied because he does not have the requisite time.

d)	Adam's application for naturalization will likely be denied because he gained LPR status through an employment-based visa.

Question 12 (4 points)

Saved

Carlos was born in Mexico. When he started elementary school, his mother left him with his grandparents in Mexico and traveled to the U.S. Carlos' mother gained LPR status and immediately filed a family-based petition for Carlos. Carlos was 12-years-old when a visa number finally became available and he entered the U.S. as an LPR. When Carlos was a 21-year-old college student, he spent a year abroad, studying in Europe. While there, he met a 14-year-old girl and the two became romantically involved. She traveled to the U.S. with Carlos on the visa waiver program. Shortly after their return to the U.S., the authorities discovered the affair and Carlos was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor. When Carlos was 25-years-old, he applied for naturalization. What is a likely result with Carlos' naturalization application?

Question 12 options:

a)	Carlos' application for naturalization will likely be approved because he has the requisite time as an LPR.

b)	Carlos' application for naturalization will likely be approved because he was lawfully admitted to the U.S.

c)	Carlos' application for naturalization will likely be denied because he spent a year out of the country.

d)	Carlos' application for naturalization will likely be denied because he was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor.

Question 13 (4 points)

Saved

Carla was born in Canada. When she started elementary school, her father left her with her aunt in Canada and traveled to the U.S. Carla's father gained LPR status and eventually naturalized. By the time he became a U.S. citizen, Carla was 13-years-old. He filed a family-based visa petition and Carla entered the U.S. as an LPR. When Carla was 17-years-old, she was convicted of burglary and sentenced to a year in prison. Following her conviction, she was detained by ICE and served with an NTA charging her with being removable for committing an aggravated felony. Carla claimed to be a U.S. citizen. Is Carla correct?

Question 13 options:

a)	Yes, because she was a minor when she was convicted of burglary.

b)	Yes, because she entered the U.S. as an LPR.

c)	No, because she has not been an LPR for 5 years.

d)	No, because she is not old enough to naturalize.

Question 14 (4 points)

Saved

When Natasha was 11-years-old, she fled her war-torn country because she feared persecution based on her family ties. She flew into Mexico and surreptitiously entered the U.S. without inspection. Within a few months, she was located by ICE, detained, and served with an NTA charging her with being removable for entering without inspection. Natasha admitted the allegations, conceded removability, and requested asylum. She was granted refugee status and allowed to remain in the U.S. When Natasha was 12-years-old, she adjusted her status to that of a LPR. At age 17, she applied for naturalization. What is a likely result with Natasha's naturalization application?

Question 14 options:

a)	Yes, because she was granted refugee status.

b)	Yes, because she has been an LPR for 5 years.

c)	No, because she is not old enough to naturalize.

d)	No, because she entered without inspection.

Question 15 (4 points)

Saved

The following fact pattern is for questions 15 and 16.

When Monica was 11-years-old, her parents fled her war-torn country because they feared persecution based on national origin. Because of the dangers associated with fleeing the country, they left Monica with family members. They flew into Mexico and surreptitiously entered the U.S. without inspection. Within a few months, they were located by ICE, detained, and served with NTAs charging them with being removable for entering without inspection. They admitted the allegations, conceded removability, and requested asylum. They were granted refugee status and allowed to remain in the U.S. When Monica was 12-years-old, her parents adjusted their status to that of a LPR. When Monica was 17-years-old, her parents naturalized as U.S. citizens. The same year that Monica parents naturalized, Monica presented herself to a Custom and Border Patrol inspection at an authorized point of entry and requested asylum. She was served with a NTA charging her with being removable for entering without valid documents.

Monica claimed to be a U.S. citizen. Is Monica correct?

Question 15 options:

a)	No, because she was not admitted as an LPR.

b)	No, because she requested asylum.

c)	Yes, because she is under 18 and her parents are U.S. citizens.

d)	Yes, because her parents are refugees.