Question: Question 11 An engineering technologist working on a construction project might be deemed to have a duty of care to a number of parties in
Question 11
-
An engineering technologist working on a construction project might be deemed to have a duty of care to a number of parties in the event of a structure failure. Which one of the following would probably NOT be owed a duty of care?
Members of the public injured in the structure's failure.
Employees at the site who are injured.
The contractor
The municipality in which the site is located.
1 points
Question 12
-
Andrew throws a baseball toward Barry, with whom he is playing catch. Andrew's aim is bad and his ball hits Cassandra, who is walking nearby.
Andrew has not committed battery against Cassandra because the contact he intended to make with Barry was not tortious because Barry consented to it.
Andrew has committed battery against Cassandra because he intended to throw the ball, which hit her.
Andrew has committed battery towards Cassandra because his intention to hit Barry with the ball is transferred to Cassandra.
Andrew has not committed battery against Cassandra because he did not intend to harm her.
1 points
Question 13
-
Appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada can be made from decisions of the following:
Tax Court of Canada
Provincial Courts of Appeal
All of the choices
Provincial Superior Courts
1 points
Question 14
-
Theft over $5,000 is?
an indictable offence
a summary conviction offence
a felony
a hybrid offence
1 points
Question 15
-
In the event there is foreseeable risk of injury from an activity, a person must:
Seek guidance from an expert in the field before proceeding
Only proceed if the risk of harm is small
If the risk is major, take reasonable care to avoid that harm
Advise the client before proceeding
1 points
Question 16
-
A legal obligation to exercise caution when certain types of conduct carry the risk of harm to others:
Strict liability
Risk management
Duty of care
Standard of care
1 points
Question 17
-
Sally and Norm have been keeping a wolf in their backyard. They found it in the woods years ago and decided to take it home and raise it. Sally and Norm were very careful to keep the wolf within their strong fence, but it managed to escape anyway and bit a child. Are Sally and Norm liable?
No, because the neighbours knew about the wolf and did not inform the police.
No, because they took all possible precautions to prevent the wolf escaping
Yes, because they didn't comply with the municipal by-law
Yes, because of strict liability
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
