Question: Question 12 2 pts Multiple Answer Options: Select all answers that are correct, whether that is one answer or more. Jack Donaghy produces a television


Question 12 2 pts Multiple Answer Options: Select all answers that are correct, whether that is one answer or more. Jack Donaghy produces a television show and wants to hire new talent. He tells his employee, Liz Lemon, to recruit Warren Griswold. Jack knows that Warren is working for a company called ABC under a two-year employment contract, and Jack knows Warren's current salary. Jack tells Liz the exact salary to offer Warren, which is an increase from Warren's current salary at ABC. As a result of the offer, Warren breaches his contract with ABC and signs with Jack's show. ABC sues Jack and Liz for Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations, which of the following is/are true: Carlie's TA Hint: Remember our in-class example during the review session. Liz is liable because an agent is always liable for torts its principal directs the agent to commit, regardless of whether Liz knew about Warren's ABC contract and salary. Jack is liable. Jack is not liable as he did not have any direct interactions with Warren. Jack and Liz are NOT liable as the facts above do not constitute an Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations Claim. Liz is liable if she knew about Warren's ABC contract and salary. Question 13 2 pts Damon Salvatore is Caroline's supervisor at Vamps and Dracs, a retail store with 20 employees that engages in interstate commerce. Caroline is an at-will employee. Damon terminates Caroline. Caroline sues for wrongful termination based on disparate treatment arguing that Damon terminated Caroline based on her gender. At trial, another employee at Vamps and Dracs, Matt Donavan, testified on behalf of Caroline. After the trial, Damon changed Matt's schedule, having him work the weekend and night shifts and refused to accommodate Matt's time-off requests. Matt seeks legal action against Damon. Which of the following is true: Mattlaill lose as retaliation protection is only for the party who filed the discrimination action. Matt will win if he can show that Damon's actions would have deterred a reasonable person from testifying in Caroline's legal action. Matt will win as Damon is not allowed to retaliate against Matt no matter how minor the actions. Matt will lose as Damon has the right to supervise as he sees fit
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
