Question $20(1$ point$)$

Julie contracts with Dorian for him to post on several social media accounts unflattering and false information about Julie's competitor. The purpose of the contract is to ruin the competitor's reputation, which in theory would result in the competitor's customers doing business with Julie. Which of the following is correct regarding this contract?

It is valid because it is not illegal.

It is valid if Julie pays consideration to Dorian for his socinl media posts.

It is unenforceable because Julie cannot disaffirm the contract.

It is unenforceable because Dorian would be committing the tort of commercial disparagement $($business$-$related defamation$).$

To determine whether the contract is valid or void, a court would first need to assess the likelihood that Julie's competitor would sustain actual damages and the significance of those damages.