Question $2$

$0\mathrm{.}7$ pts

In statutory interpretation, courts may rely on Ejusdem generis when confronted with descriptive language in a statute. It is also true that

A$)$ Ejusdem generis is a method used by the courts to resolve matters of personal jurisdiction over corporations.

B$)$ Ejusdem generis is applied when specific words follow general words and the specific words are limited to criminal narcotics legislation, such as criminal litigation involving the Controlled Substance Act.

C$)$ Ejusdem generis is applied to resolve disputes only in criminal cases.

D$)$ Ejusdem generis may be applied when general words follow specific words, the general words are limited to the same things as specific words.

Question $3$

$0\mathrm{.}7pts$

The Michigan Supreme Court, in Price v$.$ High Pointe Oil Company, Inc. $(828$ N$.$W$.2$d $660($Mich$.2013)$ applied this precedent $\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$ to determine that $\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.$

A$)$ Koester v$.$ VCA Animal Hospital$/$there is Michigan precedent that permits the recovery of damages for emotional injuries allegedly suffered as a consequence of property damage.

B$)$ Bernhardt v Ingham Regional Medical Center$/$where a family heirloom's emotional value exceeds its monetary value, the difference may be recovered by the plaintiff

C$)$ Koester v$.$ VCA Animal Hospital$/$there is no Michigan precedent that permits the recovery of damages for emotional injuries allegedly suffered as a consequence of property damag

D$)$ Sutter v$.$ Biggs$/$a defendant in a Michigan tort action may be liable for remote, speculative, and noneconomic damages in a negligence case involving the loss of privately owned pets