Question $2(10$ points$)$

Select all that are true regarding patient agreements to arbitrate healthcare disputes according to the article "Pre$-$Injury Agreements to Arbitrate Health Care Disputes: Legally "Shocking" or Legally Sensible?" by S$.$ Benson

Question $2$ options:

If a patient signs an agreement with a healthcare provider waiving their right to a jury trial before treatment begins, the courts will find that the agreement is unconscionable.

The business objectives of including arbitration provisions in the treatment or admission contract are to increase the likelihood of a more knowledgeable decision$-$maker, lower awards, and less time to resolve the dispute.

If healthcare agent, instead of the patient, signs the admission contract on behalf of the patient, the arbitration provision will not be enforceable.

There is strong public policy, both at the federal and state level, favoring arbitration agreements.