Question $22$

$2\mathrm{.}5pts$

One of these cases, discussed in lectures and$/$or the texts, is not properly matched with the concept after it$.$ Pick that mismatched case.

A $1998$ federal appeals court case holding a business liable for customers' conduct toward an employee of that business; the manager of the business, despite the employee's plea that she not deal with these customers, ordered her to keep serving the customers $-$ The case concerned a hostile work environment constituting sexual harassment.

A June $2020$ U$.$S$.$ Supreme Court holding about Title VII $-$ While the Equality Act of $2019($an unenacted bill $-$ passed by the U$.$S$.$ House of Representatives, but not the U$.$S$.$ Senate$)$ was not at issue, the Supreme Court's $6-3$ decision in effect found that the Equality Act's provisions against employment discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gende fidentity are already present in Title VII.

A $1998$ U$.$S$.$ Supreme Court case involving a substantial limitation on a life activity: reproduction $-$ The case concerned the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

A $2015$ U$.$S$.$ Supreme Court decision considering an employer's failure to try to learn about a job applicant's religious practices, so that the employer did not know how to accommodate these practices, if reasonably possible $-$ The case concerned a failure$-$to$-$hire in violation of Title VII.

The offshore oil rig U$.$S$.$ Supreme Court case of $1998-$ The case concerned sexual harassment.