Question $2(30/100)$Consider the $3$ following light solutions for an office area $($Working hours $=9$ per day, $5$ days a week$).$ The cost of electricity is $0\mathrm{.}33$ Euro$/$kWh$.$ The office requires a total of $12000$ lumens.Solution $1$:Solution $2$:Type: LED light tubeCRI $=86$Type: Florescent light tube T$8$CRI $=85$Voltage $240$ voltsVoltage $240$ voltsColor Temperature $=3500$ KColor Temperature $=4000$ KLuminous Flux $($Lumen output$)=2400$ lumensStartup time $=2$ secWattage $=22$ WLifetime $20000$ hoursLuminous Flux $($Lumen output$)=1200$ lumensStartup time $=0\mathrm{.}2$ secWattage $=9$ WLifetime $50000$ hoursPrice $16\mathrm{.}4$ EurosPrice $5\mathrm{.}1$ EurosSolution $3$:Type: Compact FlorescentCRI $=81$Voltage $240$ voltsColor Temperature $=2700$ KLuminous Flux $($Lumen output$)=1000$ lumensStartup time $=1\mathrm{.}5$ secWattage $12$ WLifetime $=10000$ hoursPrice $=1\mathrm{.}7$ Euros$1.$ Find the most economical solution for the office lighting. $(24/100)2.$ Which one of the three solution will best represent the actual colors? $(2/100)3.$ Which one of the three solution does not contain mercury? $(1/100)4.$ Which one of the three solution produces the most "yellowish" color $(1/100)5.$ Would you consider an Incandescent light bulb that costs $0\mathrm{.}95$ euros for a parking area thaa motion sensor $($total working time $45$ min per day, $7$ days a week$)?$ Why? What alternatilight bulb would you choose for this application? $(2/100$