Question $25(2\mathrm{.}5$ pts$)$Didier is hired by a company, Packages Plus Provincial $($PPP$),$ to deliver packages. He sets his own hours, pays his own insurance, and handles all matters related to taxes for his work. Didier drives his own truck, which is used mainly for PPP$\text{'}$s deliveries. Didier is paid for each delivered package, not at an hourly rate. To maximize his efficiency, Didier on his own invents a shrink ray so he can carry more packages. PPP hears about this invention and claims ownership of it because, PPP claims, Didier is PPP$\text{'}$s employee. Didier refuses to concede the ownership to PPP; and PPP seeks an injunction against Didier to$,$ in effect, have the court declare that PPP owns the invention. Which of the following is the most likely outcome and the strongest reason?$*$ The injunction will be denied because Didier did not use PPP property or time to create the shrink ray.$*$ The injunction will be granted because of the Shop Rights Doctrine.$*$ The injunction will be granted because Didier uses the shrink ray while delivering for PPP$.*$ The injunction will be denied because Didier thought of the idea first.$*$ The injunction will be granted under common law standards.