Question 2 Consider the below scenario and answer the discussion questions that follow: (Marks: 70) You are part of a South African psychometric team that have developed a School Readiness Measure for Children (SRM-C) between the ages of five and seven years. The measure you have developed assesses developmental domains in areas such as cognition, emotion, and social maturity etc. Your team has decided to present your preliminary SRM-C to a panel of professionals, so that they can provide feedback for any final revisions. The panel consists of developmental psychologists and psychometric experts, and they have the following questions for you: Note: Every answer needs to be academically referenced to prove your understanding (minimum two sources per sub-question). Your answers do not need to exceed +/-1 full typed page to be correct and relevant. Provide quality over quantity. Furthermore, these are scenario questions and require you to insightfully hypothesise and research widely to show your understanding of psychometric concepts. Be guided by the bolded words for the subject of each question. Lastly, SRM-C is a fictional measure. 21; 22; 23 2023 Q.2.1 Q.2.2 Discuss internal consistency and how your SRM-C team established internal consistency for your measure. Provide practical examples where necessary, to support your understanding of the concept. (20) Discuss how you and your SRM-C team established construct validity through correlation with other tests for your measure. Provide at least two practical (30) examples to support your understanding of the concept. Q.2.3 In your presentation of your data analysis for the test-retest reliability of the SRM- C, you mentioned that "children who were likely to show either poor performance because of learning difficulties or invalid assessments were excluded". Explain why this was the done. (20) [TOTAL MARKS: 100]