Question: Question 20 Question 202 Points Question 20 The actual cause of negligence is sometimes called the but for event that is a breach of duty
Question 20
Question 202 Points
Question 20
The actual cause of negligence is sometimes called the "but for" event that is a breach of duty on the part of the defendant
True
False
Clear selection
Question 19
Question 192 Points
Question 19
Under common law, extortion could only be committed by a government official, who corruptly collected an unlawful fee under color of office
True
False
Clear selection
Question 18
Question 182 Points
Question 18
The concern over reasonableness and standards of care are elements of negligence theory.
True
False
Clear selection
Question 17
Question 172 Points
Question 17
Under common law, extortion could only be committed by a government official, who corruptly collected an unlawful fee under color of office
True
False
Clear selection
Question 16
Question 162 Points
Question 16
Under criminal law, if a responsible officer in a corporation has directed an act of corruption, the corporation will be held liable for it.
True
False
Clear selection
Question 15
Question 152 Points
Question 15
The failure to warn a potential user of possible hazards can make a product defective under Restatement, Section 402A, whether unreasonably dangerous or even unavoidably unsafe.
True
False
Clear selection
Question 14
Question 142 Points
Question 14
The law of negligence requires us to behave with due regard for the unforeseeable consequences of our actions in order to avoid reasonable risks of injury
True
False
Clear selection
Question 13
Question 132 Points
Question 13
The theory of caveat emptor governed the consumer law from the early eighteenth century until the early twentieth century
True
False
Clear selection
Question 12
Question 122 Points
Question 12
The word tort is derived from the French word tortum, which means twisted or crooked.
True
False
Clear selection
Question 11
Question 112 Points
Question 11
Tort law is more concerned than criminal law about the reasons for a defendant's actions
True
False
Clear selection
Question 10
Question 102 Points
Question 10
Which of the following is true about the dimensions of tort liability?
Option A
- The law condemns every act that ultimately results in injury.
Option B
b.Most tort suits rely on intentional fault.
Option C
- Since tort law focuses on injury to the plaintiff, it is more concerned than criminal law about the reasons for the defendant's actions.
Option D
The most obvious standard is willful conduct.
Option E
Tort law, including strict liability, relies on standards of fault, or blameworthiness
Question 9
Question 92 Points
Question 9
Tom, Dick, and Harry decide to rob a supermarket. While Tom buys a car to be used as the getaway, only Dick and Harry rob the supermarket after which all three flee in the car. Only Dick and Harry can be convicted of conspiracy to commit robbery
True
False
Clear selection
Question 8
Question 82 Points
Question 8
The Restatement says recovery under strict liability is limited to "physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate user or consumer, or to his property," but not other losses and not economic losses.
True
False
Clear selection
Question 7
Question 72 Points
Question 7
Strict liability is liability without proof of negligence and without privity
True
False
Clear selection
Question 6
Question 62 Points
Question 6
Products liability refers to a separate theory of liability.
True
False
Clear selection
Question 5
Question 52 Points
Question 5
In practice, a person asserting a claim for breach of warranty will have a good chance of success under an express warranty or implied warranty theory of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
True
False
Clear selection
Question 4
Question 42 Points
Question 4
The seriousness of a crime is defined by the nature or duration of the punishment set out in the statute.
True
False
Clear selection
Question 3
Question 32 Points
Question 3
In a typical products-liability case, _____.
Option A
three legal theories are asserted- two contract theories and one tort theory
Option B
the contract theory is negligence, governed by the common law
Option C
the contract theory of negligence is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code
Option D
the strict products policy is considered a contract theory
Option E
the tort theories are governed by the common law
Question 2
Question 22 Points
Question 2
In a strict liability case, the plaintiff does not need to show "fault" (or negligence).
True
False
Clear selection
A defense to a plaintiff's action in tort where the plaintiff has knowingly and voluntarily entered into a hazardous activity which results in injury is known as _____.
Option A
causation in fact
Option B
assumption of risk
Option C
res ipsa loquitur
Option D
negligence of plaintiff
Option E
negligence per se
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
