Question 23 14 pts James Doe interviewed for a position with the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA). He talked with the person who would ultimately be his supervisor, Jane Smith, and was offered a salary of $49,300 by her. Smith told him that it was a good salary and he should take it without negotiating because her feelings would be hurt and she might take any negotiating into account when determining his yearly raises in the future. James accepted the offer at the end of the interview and was told to return the following day to fill out the paperwork. Under CTA procedures, only the Placement Department could actually give final salary offers. When Placement's figure for James was computed, it was lower ($40,000), and this was the amount James was actually offered when he returned the next day to fill out the paperwork. James sued to receive the higher salary offered by Smith. CTA claims that Smith had no authority to offer a particular salary and that it is not bound by her offer. Discuss the legal issues in the case from both CTA's and Doe's perspectives. Who is likely to prevail if the case goes to trial? Why? Explain your answer. Edit View Insert Format Tools Table 12ptParagraph B I U ALTY