QUESTION 23 SAME FACT PATTERN AS ABOVE, BUT WITH SOME ADDITIONAL FACTS Archie and Edith are getting a divorce, and it's not going well. Edith has started blogging about her experiences living with Archie, and she's made some pretty startling statements. For example, last month she wrote that he likes to "steal sausages and hairspray" from HEB and he regularly dumps a mixture of motor oil and lemonade in the local fishing pond. The following week she announced that Archie is sexually attracted to nuns and he cheated on his qualification test to get his architecture license. None of this is true. For awhile, Archie is unaware that Edith is writing these things about him, until one day some guys down at the architecture firm start hassling him about stealing sausages. When he realizes what's happened, Archie becomes enraged and throws his stapler at his antagonizers, making perfect contact with Mike Stivic and planting a staple right in the middle of his forehead. Mike requires a few stitches, but his embarrassment is his greatest pain. He decides to sue Archie for interfering with his First Amendment rights. The way Mike sees it, the Constitution gives him the right to say what he wants to say, and by throwing a stapler at him, Archie was trying to interfere with that right. Will Mike be able to take his case to Federal court? Why or why not? TTT Arial 3 (12) TE-> MacBook Air R H B N M