Question $3(2$ points$)$ Saved A $55$ year$-$old supervisor at a private company, who has always received good performance appraisals, is nevertheless fired. Two younger supervisors $(37$ and $42$ years old, respectively$)$ from the same department and whose performance appraisals have been lower than the $55$ year old's, were nonetheless retained by the company. The employer says that it had to save money and that the older supervisor earned considerably more money than the younger supervisors, which he did. If the termination is legally challenged, a court would most likely decide: for the employee because the employer has engaged in disparate treatment based on age. for the employer because it had a lawful, non$-$discriminatory motive for the termination. for the employer because one of the employees retained was also over $40$ years of age. for the employer because employee could not establish a prima facie case of age discrimination under the ADEA.