Question: Question 3 (3 points): Assuming there is no random variability or bias, indicate the type of confounding (each worth 0.5 point). Unadjusted Relative Risk Adjusted
Question 3 (3 points): Assuming there is no random variability or bias, indicate the type of confounding (each worth 0.5 point).
| Unadjusted Relative Risk | Adjusted Relative Risk | Confounding Type |
| 4.1 | 3.8 | |
| 0.9 | 1.7 | |
| 0.6 | 0.2 | |
| 2.0 | 2.6 | |
| 0.2 | 0.5 | |
| 1.9 | 0.6 |
Question 4 (9 points): Researchers are studying the association between alcohol consumption and the development of pancreatic cancer. They are concerned there may be confounding based upon sex at birth and have decided to see if there is an association with alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer development. Please calculate the odds ratio for the following 2x2 tables and interpret the results to indicate if you think there may be confounding.
Alcohol consumption vs pancreatic cancer development
| Cases | Controls | Total | |
| High Consumption | 124 | 98 | 222 |
| Low Consumption | 367 | 282 | 649 |
| 491 | 380 | 871 |
Odds ratio =
Interpretation:
Sex at birth vs alcohol consumption
| Males | Females | Total | |
| High Consumption | 173 | 49 | 222 |
| Low Consumption | 151 | 498 | 649 |
| 324 | 547 | 871 |
Odds ratio =
Interpretation:
Sex at birth vs pancreatic cancer development
| Cases | Controls | Total | |
| Males | 165 | 159 | 324 |
| Females | 326 | 221 | 547 |
| 491 | 380 | 871 |
Odds ratio =
Interpretation:
Question 5 (4 points): The researchers studying the association between alcohol consumption and the development of pancreatic cancer now want to see if sex at birth explains their observed association between alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer by using stratification-based methods. Please calculate the odds ratio for the following 2x2 tables and interpret the results to indicate if you think sex at birth explains the association between alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer.
Males
| Cases | Controls | Total | |
| High Consumption | 43 | 130 | 173 |
| Low Consumption | 68 | 83 | 151 |
| 111 | 213 | 324 |
Odds ratio =
Females
| Cases | Controls | Total | |
| High Consumption | 36 | 13 | 49 |
| Low Consumption | 198 | 300 | 498 |
| 234 | 313 | 547 |
Odds ratio =
Interpretation:
Question 6 (3 points): Please calculate the Mantel-Haenszel weighted odds ratio for the association between alcohol consumption and the development of pancreatic cancer after stratification on sex at birth. Do you think it is appropriate to calculate this ORMH?
Question 7 (3 points):Define residual confounding and discuss if there is a possibility for residual confounding in question 5 after controlling for sex at birth.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
