Question $37$

$2$ pts

Prosecutor Reeves charges that your $$10,000$ contribution to Lucinda Snopes is illegal under a Georgia law that prohibits corporations from donating any money to political campaigns. You argue that this law infringes on your constitutional right to freedom of speech. You are:

$$ correct, the state restriction is too far reaching

incorrect, because states may prohibit the use of corporate money for supporting political candidates

correct, under the ruling of Southern Pacific v$,$ Arizona

correct, state laws may not infringe upon constitutionally guaranteed rights such as freedom of speech

incorrect, because your speech impedes interstate commerce and so cannot be considered "free speech"