Question $4(2$ points$)$

A contractor accepts a project, after

go$-$ahead, and the contractor

discovers that the statement of work

was ill$-$defined and pushed through

scope changes that significantly

alienate the customer. The customer

pays for the scope changes and then

files a law suit against the contractor

to recover the cost of the scope

changes. Neglecting the type of

contract, the court would most likely

rule that: $(2$ pts$.)$

The contractor is at fault for

accepting a contract with ill$-$

defined requirements and nc

discovering this initially.