Question $51(1$ point$)$

Jeffrey Wigand blew the whistle on Brown and Williamson, a tobacco company, because they were knowingly inflicting serious harms on their consumers. Jeff first addressed the issue by reporting it to his supervisor and was immediately fired. As a result, he took the evidence to the public so that people would become aware of the risks associated with smoking and so that harms could be reduced. Did Jeff fulfill the requirements that make Whistleblowing justified?

$$ Yes

$$ No