Question 5 [3 points} How would a court determine whether Queen's had met the standard of a reasonable university in this case? What factors might it consider? Do you think that Queen's met the standard? Why or why not? Question 3 [1 point} x! Saved Which of the following best describes the standard that would apply in this case? 0 a} The standard of a highly diligent university administration. 0 b) The standard of a somewhat careful university administration. 0 c} The standard of a reasonable university administration. (9 d} None of the above. Question 4 [1 point} x! Saved If the university is found liable for Ahmed's injuries, which of the following best represents the purpose a court would aim for in assessing damages? 0 a} To punish the university and ensure this kind of accident does not recur. O b} To put the plaintiff {Ahmed} in the position he would have been in if the tort had not occurred. 0 c} To put the plaintiff {Ahmed} in the most nancially secure position possible given his injuries. 6) d} None of the above. Question 1 [1 point) v' Saved Ahmed was walking to his class at Queen's when he fell on the icy sidewalk. There had been a heavyr snowstorm followed by a thaw and flash freeze in the last few days. There was no salt or sand on the sidewalk, and it had not been cleared since the snowstorm. Assume that the sidewalk was private, and that Queen's is responsible for maintaining it. If Ahmed wants to sue the university, which of the following torts might he sue for? G) a} Negligence. O b} Intentional infliction of mental suffering. O c} Battery 0 d} Nuisance. Question 2 [1 point} a! Saved lf Ahmed sues the university for the tort of negligence, which of the following will he have to prove? O a} That the university owed him a duty of care. 0 b) That the university breached its standard of care. 0 c} That the university's breach caused his injuries. 6) d} All of the above