Question $58$

$2$ pts

Flush$-$O$,$ a strong toilet bowl cleaner, states clearly on its package that it is poison. Flush$-$O$\text{'}$s cap is easy to remove. A small child opens a bottle left in a bathroom cabinet, drinks some Flush$-$O$,$ and is injured. If the child's parents sue the makers of Flush$-$O$,$ Flush$-$O is likely to:

win because of contributory negligence by the parents

lose because of failure to warn or design defect

lose because of express warranty of safety

lose because of unknown hazards

win because of assumption of the risk