Question $5$

In Katzenbach v$.$ McClung the U$.$S$.$ Supreme court ruled:

All of the answers.

Since McClung had business that was purely local, the commerce clause of the U$.$S$.$ Constitution did

not apply in this case.

Since McClung purchased over $\frac{1}{3}$ of the restaurant's supplies from distributors who at some point

were interstate, McClung was subject to the federal regulation based upon the commerce clause of

the U$.$S$.$ Constitution.

Since McClung allowed "colored" people to buy takeout in the back of the restaurant but not sit

down with "white" folks inside, the commerce clause of the U$.$S$.$ Constitution did not apply since this

was not considered commerce.