Question: Question 8 Mark this question In which scenario would strict liability most likely apply? A lightbulb burns out prematurely. A dishwasher fails to fully clean

Question 8

Mark this question

In which scenario would strict liability most likely apply?

  • A lightbulb burns out prematurely.
  • A dishwasher fails to fully clean the dishes.
  • An airplane's brakes fail in freezing weather.
  • A car's radio sometimes stops working.

Question 9

Mark this question

Under contract law, a promise not to do something that a person could otherwise do __________.

  • is called a forbearance, but is not adequate legal consideration for a contract
  • is only deemed legal consideration for a contract if the person giving it is financially harmed
  • is called a forbearance and is an adequate legal value to support the existence of consideration for a contract
  • is called promissory estoppel, and qualifies as legal consideration

Malia signs a contract to purchase a used car. The seller breaches the contract, but Malia is able to buy the exact same car from another dealer at a better price. Malia sues the original seller and is awarded $2.

This is an example of which type of monetary award?

  • Incidental damages
  • Punitive damages
  • Restitution
  • Nominal damages

Question 11

Mark this question

Tort law is similar to criminal law in that __________.

  • they both require specific intent on the part of the defendant
  • they both have primarily developed in common law courts
  • they both require specific intent on the part of the plaintiff
  • they both require a wrongful act by a defendant for the plaintiff to recover

Question 12

Mark this question

A children's highchair is recalled after numerous reports emerge of children slipping out of the safety restraint and falling to the floor, injuring themselves. The product has a label that warns parents to strap children in while they aresitting in the highchair. Several parents sue for negligence.

How strong is their negligence case against the product manufacturer?

  • Strong, because the highchair's manufacturer failed to warn users of its potential dangers.
  • Strong, because the highchair clearly has a defective design that makes it unsafe.
  • Weak, because proximate cause is difficult to establish.
  • Weak, because parents can't expect children to sit still in a highchair.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!