Question $9(1$ point$)$

Listen

Review the $2008$ Ontario court's decision in Colwell v$.$ Cornerstone Properties Inc. The plaintiff claimed that she had been constructively dismissed when her employer violated her privacy by secretly installing a camera in her office. The Court determined that:

Mrs$.$ Colwell failed to mitigate her damages.

Mrs$.$ Colwell is entitled to aggravated damages.

At this juncture, Canadian employment standards legislation has not gone very far in safeguarding the employee's right to privacy in the workplace

Mrs$.$ Colwell was obligated to return to Cornerstone in order to mitigate her damages.