Question: Can you help me make policy debate about "We shouldn't enact Ron Desantis' bill against gender affirming care for minors" nude with the harms, inherency, plan/solvency and the disadvantage

I. Harms

A. The system makes minor less..

1.

.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

*Attached photo is just an example outline*

\fIll. [lnherency] We don't need the plan to fix any "problems": We can keep the system with minor repairs. A. Self-esteem and condence issues can be addressed by tweaking the way awards are distributed [Everyone's a winner!) 1. Beauty pageants could crown all contestants as \"future winners,\" or give them special titles according to what they do best. This will keep kids from winning and losing. Every child will get a crown and feel good about themselves. It will build self-esteem and pOIse. Makeup, hairspray, teeth whitening, spray tans, high heels, and adult style costumes and routines can simply be regulated to be "age appropriate\". 1. Already happening in status quo: "Natural pageants\" 2. Some pageants already regulate appropriate bathing suits. 3. Some pageants already self-regulating; shows industry support. Beauty pageants could give children breaks for rest and sleeping, and provide balanced nutritional health foods. 1. We need to eliminate "pageant crack,\" which is Pixie Stix and \"Go-gojuice" which is half Mountain Dew and half Red Bull. Simply don't let them compete if they bring sugary and/or caf'feinated foods or beverages. Problem ain't pageants; it's PARENTS. Regulate the pageants so that parents won't have incentive or ability to expose kids to harm