Question: QUESTION THREE [ 3 5 ] Heels ( Pty ) Ltd ( the company ) , a resident of the Republic, is a company engaged
QUESTION THREE
Heels Pty Ltd the company a resident of the Republic, is a company engaged in the
manufacture of shoes. The companys financial year ends on the last day of February.
Heels Pty Ltd is not considered to be a small business corporation. During the year of
assessment, the company embarked on an expansion project, in order to meet an increase
in the demand for their shoes. The following transactions were entered into as part of their
expansion initiative ignore VAT for the purposes of this question:
Heels Pty Ltd conducts its manufacturing business from a building it purchased for
Rof which R related to the land on June Due to the
expansion project underway, a need arose to acquire additional premises. The
company entered into a year lease agreement on January with the owner
of the adjacent building, who is also a registered taxpayer. Heels Pty Ltd took
occupation immediately and began production in the leased building. The terms of
the lease, are as follows:
o Heels Pty Ltd is required to pay a monthly rental of R payable on the
first day of every month, from January
o A lease premium of R was payable by Heels Pty Ltd on January
A clause in the lease agreement stipulated that the lessee is to effect
improvements to the building at a cost of R The improvements were
completed and brought into use on February at a cost of R
The improvements to the building are considered to be used in the process of
manufacture.
On August five identical machines costing R each were acquired from
Broke Pty Ltd an independent unconnected resident company that also
manufactured shoes that was shutting down. These machines were originally
purchased new by Broke Pty Ltd and used in its process of manufacture.
Heels Pty Ltd brought these machines into use in its process of manufacture from
the date it commenced manufacturing in the leased premises see above The
market value of each machine on the date of purchase was R
On December the company concluded a contract for the purchase of a new
cutting machine that was to be used in the process of manufacture, at a cost of
R The supplier of the machine agreed to a delivery date of January
but due to the suppliers employees going on strike, the machine was only delivered
on February Due to the delay, the supplier agreed to a lower selling price of
R The contract was updated and the supplier invoiced Heels Pty Ltd for
R which was paid via EFT on the date of delivery. Heels Pty Ltd paid an
additional R for the installation of the machine which took place on February
and the machine was immediately brought into use on that date.
New furniture was purchased for the leased premises at a cost of R on
January and immediately brought into use. A new delivery vehicle was purchased and brought into used on February at
a cost of R
The company owns other two delivery vehicles which were purchased on March
at a cost of R each, which have been fully writtenoff for tax purposes.
On February one of these vehicles was sold for R
Additional information:
The Commissioner of SARS has approved the following writeoff periods on a
straightline basis:
o Furniture years and
o Delivery vehicles years. Required: Calculate the effects on Heels Pty Ltds taxable income arising from each of the
transactions listed above for the year of assessment. Round off to the nearest Rand.
Show ALL workings.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
