Question#3) Using Critical Thinking Process, Compare the performance of write operations achieved by a RAID level 5 organization with that achieved by a RAID level 1 organization.

NOTE: Since performance is characterized by several criteria, and there are two possible write operations (single block and multiple contiguous blocks), applying the Critical Thinking Process is expected here.

In This Format:

For Example:

Critical Thinking Process Purpose: To analyze and critically weigh alternatives, discussing the trade-offs in different perspectives An approach to making informed, unemotional decisions to is employ the following 4 step process: A) Identify your options Create a list of option names, and if necessary provide a short description B) Establish your criteria for this particular situation Create a list of criteria names, and if necessary provide a short description, of the criteria you will use to decide what option best fits your situation. Include options from all stakeholders including the Customer's perspective (the one with the money buying or product or paying you to build the product) and from the Chief Engineer's perspective (the one responsible for ensuring the product meets all the ities (usability, scalability, quality, maintainability, et), key performance metrics, and requirements). Good criteria are stated as a benefit to the stakeholder and answer the "so what? question. C) Weigh your options against your criteria Create a table with your criteria as columns and options as rows. Populate the table. If populoting with relative numerical scores, add a column for total score. If populating with narrative, include the criteria's relative value to the stakeholder D) Select and defend your option Affirmatively select one of the items from your list of options in step A). You are the decision maker and are selecting right now, so avoid words like "suggest..., recommend... or l would..., etc. For example,say something like "1 am going with option coption number and name> because." Be certoin the criteria established in step B) and weighed in step c) appear in your rationale Critical Thinking Process Purpose: To analyze and critically weigh alternatives, discussing the trade-offs in different perspectives An approach to making informed, unemotional decisions to is employ the following 4 step process: A) Identify your options Create a list of option names, and if necessary provide a short description B) Establish your criteria for this particular situation Create a list of criteria names, and if necessary provide a short description, of the criteria you will use to decide what option best fits your situation. Include options from all stakeholders including the Customer's perspective (the one with the money buying or product or paying you to build the product) and from the Chief Engineer's perspective (the one responsible for ensuring the product meets all the ities (usability, scalability, quality, maintainability, et), key performance metrics, and requirements). Good criteria are stated as a benefit to the stakeholder and answer the "so what? question. C) Weigh your options against your criteria Create a table with your criteria as columns and options as rows. Populate the table. If populoting with relative numerical scores, add a column for total score. If populating with narrative, include the criteria's relative value to the stakeholder D) Select and defend your option Affirmatively select one of the items from your list of options in step A). You are the decision maker and are selecting right now, so avoid words like "suggest..., recommend... or l would..., etc. For example,say something like "1 am going with option coption number and name> because." Be certoin the criteria established in step B) and weighed in step c) appear in your rationale