Questions. 1. (25 Points ) a. You are a USPTO patent examiner tasked with examination of the application for Andy McAnic. Searching for prior art, you find a first reference which is a published patent application, filed on March 16, 2014 and assigned to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. The patent application discloses a device relating to a mechanical directional horn. You also find a second reference directed to an electronic, directional trumpet in an academic paper published in Journal of Sound Engineering published on December 5, 2015. What rejection under 101, 102, 103 and/or 112 would you give in an office action and why? b. You are a patent attorney hired by McAnic and Kawasagi. After they received the office action (Question la), they felt the rejections were over their head, so they come to you for your assistance. Draft an outline of a response to the rejections in the office action. Suggest the dropping or amending claims if appropriate. 2. ( 25 Points ) Write a memo to your managing partner evaluating: i. eligibility of the invention under 35 USC 101.- in flow chart form. ii. Any inventorship issues that may arise