QUESTIONS AND CASE PROBLEMS 18 HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS AND CASE PROBLEMS 15.1 The One-Year Rule. On May 1 by telephone, Yo offer to lite 3 The contra Be to perform personal services On Max 5. Benson retu Yul call and accepts the offer Decissfully whether 13.2 Hypothetical this contract falls under the Statute of Frands in the follow a local hach ingrance ber brothers 1 The contact calls for Be to be employed for me year the debt. Mest with the right to be in performance immediately Why or 2 The contract calls for Benson to be comployed for me la for a sample months, with performance of services to begin on 2 end of this te September 344 UNIT TO CONTRACTS I Alter you he 133 Collateral Promises Jeremy took his mother on a special hol Canopy day to Mountain Resort. Jere was a frequentation of is expues the two and was well known by its manager. There suit in UL required cach of ih potom to make a large deposit to ensure of contract payment of the room rental Jeremy asked the manager to responded the wane the requirement for his mother and told the manager agreement that his mother for any reason failed to pay the set for refise to con her stay there, he would cover the bill Rehing on Jeremy's promise, the manager waved the deposito rement for Inc., 2004 Jeremy's mother. After she came home from her holiday Jeremy's mother chied to pay the resort bill. The resort with the same manager tried to collect them from Jeremy, but Jeremy ahochwed to pay stating that his promne was not enforce accompanies this te able under the State of Pand. Is Jeremy contece Explain "Chapter 15," and 13.4 The One-Year Rule. On January 1, Damon, for consen, 13.7 The Parol Evi orally proused to pay any 5300 a month for as long as Gary St. Joe, Indu lived with the payment to be made on the first day of every December month Damon made the payments rularly for nine that he inten mouth and then made no further payment. Gany claimed offered to bu that Damon lud beached the wall contact and sad Damon ictimai for damages. Damen contended that the contract was Kring and HD forceable because, under the Statute of Frand contact that provided that can be performed within one year met be in writing son of the Discs whether Damon will succeed in this defence agreement 13.5 Interest in Land. Sierra Brava, Inc. and Shelby, Inc there are no cntered into a titten Waste Dipoul Agreement under agree which Shelby allowed Sierra to deporton Shelby land 2000, the ho waste products, deletetom hamtal materials, and debris Hieber filed removed by Sierra in the construction of a highway. Later received the Shelbys asked Sea why it had not constructed a waterway and a building pad stable for a contactal building on breach of the property, as they had tally agreed. Sieradenied any considered wch agreement Shelby's filed a suit in a Mise state their court against Smalleging breach of contract. Sierra con Hicher 2 tended that any oral agreement was toenforceable under 13.8 Contract for the Statute of Fou Siena argued that because the night writing to be to move minerals from land is considered a contract for cry for $154 the sale of an interest in and to which the Statute of remaining 2 Frauds applies the Statute of Frauds should apply to the beginpeal right to deposit on another penon's property How fifteen mo should the court rude, and why Shelby, Inc. Sinne the yard a Brow, Inc. 65 SW 3d 64 (Ma App SD 2002) QUESTIONS AND CASE PROBLEMS 18 HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS AND CASE PROBLEMS 15.1 The One-Year Rule. On May 1 by telephone, Yo offer to lite 3 The contra Be to perform personal services On Max 5. Benson retu Yul call and accepts the offer Decissfully whether 13.2 Hypothetical this contract falls under the Statute of Frands in the follow a local hach ingrance ber brothers 1 The contact calls for Be to be employed for me year the debt. Mest with the right to be in performance immediately Why or 2 The contract calls for Benson to be comployed for me la for a sample months, with performance of services to begin on 2 end of this te September 344 UNIT TO CONTRACTS I Alter you he 133 Collateral Promises Jeremy took his mother on a special hol Canopy day to Mountain Resort. Jere was a frequentation of is expues the two and was well known by its manager. There suit in UL required cach of ih potom to make a large deposit to ensure of contract payment of the room rental Jeremy asked the manager to responded the wane the requirement for his mother and told the manager agreement that his mother for any reason failed to pay the set for refise to con her stay there, he would cover the bill Rehing on Jeremy's promise, the manager waved the deposito rement for Inc., 2004 Jeremy's mother. After she came home from her holiday Jeremy's mother chied to pay the resort bill. The resort with the same manager tried to collect them from Jeremy, but Jeremy ahochwed to pay stating that his promne was not enforce accompanies this te able under the State of Pand. Is Jeremy contece Explain "Chapter 15," and 13.4 The One-Year Rule. On January 1, Damon, for consen, 13.7 The Parol Evi orally proused to pay any 5300 a month for as long as Gary St. Joe, Indu lived with the payment to be made on the first day of every December month Damon made the payments rularly for nine that he inten mouth and then made no further payment. Gany claimed offered to bu that Damon lud beached the wall contact and sad Damon ictimai for damages. Damen contended that the contract was Kring and HD forceable because, under the Statute of Frand contact that provided that can be performed within one year met be in writing son of the Discs whether Damon will succeed in this defence agreement 13.5 Interest in Land. Sierra Brava, Inc. and Shelby, Inc there are no cntered into a titten Waste Dipoul Agreement under agree which Shelby allowed Sierra to deporton Shelby land 2000, the ho waste products, deletetom hamtal materials, and debris Hieber filed removed by Sierra in the construction of a highway. Later received the Shelbys asked Sea why it had not constructed a waterway and a building pad stable for a contactal building on breach of the property, as they had tally agreed. Sieradenied any considered wch agreement Shelby's filed a suit in a Mise state their court against Smalleging breach of contract. Sierra con Hicher 2 tended that any oral agreement was toenforceable under 13.8 Contract for the Statute of Fou Siena argued that because the night writing to be to move minerals from land is considered a contract for cry for $154 the sale of an interest in and to which the Statute of remaining 2 Frauds applies the Statute of Frauds should apply to the beginpeal right to deposit on another penon's property How fifteen mo should the court rude, and why Shelby, Inc. Sinne the yard a Brow, Inc. 65 SW 3d 64 (Ma App SD 2002)