Questions for Part 1 1. Is there a valid contract between Kathryn and RENOS? Provide an explanation with reference to the elements for a valid contract. (9 marks)

2. Did RENOS breach the contract with Kathryn? If so, how was it breached? (4 marks)

3. Assuming there was a breach, what remedies are available to the innocent party? (4 marks)

4. Kathryn received an invoice from RENOS which was in excess of the amount provided for in the contract. Despite Toms verbal assurances that the costs for obtaining the permits and rezoning of Kathryns home were included in the contract, the invoice contains additional charges for these items. (i) Is Kathryn required to pay this amount? What arguments can Kathryn make that she is not liable for these amounts? (4 marks) (ii) What problems or obstacles does Kathryn have with her argument? Provide a full explanation of the problems. (4 marks) (iii) Who would be the Plaintiff and who would be the defendant?(2 marks)9 | Page (iv) Who would be successful? Why? Be sure to cite any cases that may apply. (3 marks)

5. Is the contract between Kathryn and Davinder valid and enforceable? What, if any, arguments would be made against enforcement? (4 marks)