re write this:

After thoroughly analyzing the data, I have concluded that the salesperson's claim is

valid. The alternative hypothesis is the salesperson's claim that the average cost per square foot

of his home sales is above the average cost per square foot in the Pacific region. And the null

hypothesis is the Pacific region's average cost per square foot is greater than or equal to the

salesperson's average cost per square foot. From the calculations, we can prove the salesperson's

claim that his average cost per square foot is above the Pacific region's. Moreover, these

calculations are statistically significant because the p-value (0.015) of the sample is below the

significance level of 0.05.