READ AND ANSWER THESE TRUE/FALSE AND MULTPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS UNDER 20 MINTUTES ! SUBJECT : CHILDEN'S RIGHTS AND THE LAW

1. It is probable that Marie's assessment of the Joshua's becoming more "lazy" was actually because his brain had suffered several hemorages from abuse over the previous weeks. True OR False
2. Randy received 20 years in prison for his crimes. True OR False
3. Under general legal principles, states are not held liable for harm inflicted upon an individual by a third party. True OR False
4. A state may assume an affirmative duty to protect an individual from harm done by a private party if the state has placed the individual in a situation in which he cannot defend himself. True OR False
5. According to "special relationships" it would have been even harder to find the state guilty of negligence if Joshua had been hurt/abused in foster care. True OR False
6. Children suffering from abuse and neglect at the hands of their parents or legal guardians inhabited a peculiar status in the 1980s in which their physical safety depended on agents whose goal was not to penalize offending parents but to preserve the familyby fixing the family's environment to stop future maltreatment. True OR False
7. Which case facts allege t a 5 year old girl being abused by boyfriend. Social services (YCCYS) told mom had to make byfriend move out. YCCYS did not confirm independently that the conditions for her return had been met (in fact all three continued to live together). Died a month later by injuries caused by mom and boyfriend. Suite claimed that the family preservation model that privileged keeping a fmily together, amounted to an abuse of state power, violating the constitutional righs of both Aleta and her father. What is significant of Bailey is that it asked the court to recognize that children have rights under the U.S. Consitution (not just about parents rights over child). a failure to send paramedics resulted in death. Dispatcher told the person to just breathe in a bag, because she thought they were trouble makers. A. Estate of Bailey v. County of York B. Bowers v. DeVito C. Archie v. City of Racine D. Jensen v. Conrad
8. Select that case that matches the description: Prison inmate who had sustained injuries by slipping on a pillow negligently left on some stairs. He invoked a "special relationship" in order to convert a common law tort into a federal civil rights action. Supreme court refused to recognize this as an incident that rose to the level of due process protection that was used for purposes of oppression. The inference of the case was that personal injury cases do not normally rise to the level of a constitutional challenge A. Davidson v. Cannon B. Archie v. City of Racine C. Daniels v. Williamson D.Section 1983
9. The Appellate court found that the DSS had deprived Joshua of a constitutional right to be protected from his father's violence True OR False
10. The appellate court rejected the Third Circuit's determination in Estate of Bailey that a special relationship-resulting in a constitutional duty to protect- occurs once a state becomes aware that a particular child may be undergoing abuse in the home. True OR False
11. The Appellate court found that the state and DSS had been complicit in the beatings that had left Joshua "essentially immobilized for life"creating a deprivation of the boys liberty under the due process clause." True OR False
12. In Youngberg v. Romeo, a case involving a mentally impaired adult male who had received numerous physical injuries while living in a state institution in PA, theCourt said the 14^thamendment does indeed afford individuals a right to personal security. True OR False
13. Sullivan, counsel for Joshua, argued before the Supreme Court that they were not seeking to show that the state has a duty to protect all children. True OR False
14. The author's throw out there that even Joshua's attorney seemed unprepared to argue before the Supreme Court. True OR False
15. Which Justice felt that there was ample evidence that the state became aware after his initial hospitalization that it had, in fact, placed the boy in severe jeopardy. Once the realization was made, however, it had failed to remove him from that danger. A. Blackmun B. Brennan C. White D. Rheinquist
16. New legislation that was passed after this case made national attention helped compliance rates for social workers complying with mandated reporting laws (according to the journal Social Work) in which noncompliance rates for mandated reporting fell to just 10%. True OR False
17. Select THE CASE THAT STATES: There is nothing in the Constitution which requires governmental units to act when members of the general public are in danger. A. Archie v. City of Racine B. Davidson v. Cannon C. Daniels v. WilliamsoN D. Anderson v. Thompson
18. In which case did the complainant warn prison officials that he was in danger after he had received threats from other inmates, he later was assaulted. Said that such a lack of care simply does not approach the sort of abusive government conduct that the due process. A. Daniels v. Williamson B. Archie v. City of Racine C. Anderson v. Thompson D. Davidson v. Cannon