Read Jennings $(10$th ed$.)$ Case $2\mathrm{.}10$: Penn State: Framing Ethical Issues $($pp$.122-135)$; then, answer the following

questions:

$1.$Penn State is an honorable institution that is trying desperately to defend it$$s $[$sic$]$ ethics and all of the individuals

who had nothing to do with this horrific scandal, which have been destroyed by the actions$/$ inactions of a few

individuals $...$ The quote comes from a blog on the Penn State scandal. Evaluate the accuracy of the blogger$$s

thoughts.

$$ Why does it happen that many are punished for the actions of a few? Or is that an accurate assessment $-$

is it the actions of a few?

$2.$ Oregon State President Ed Ray, who announced the Penn State sanctions, said that what happened occurred

because of the Penn State culture, that the football program had consumed the values of the university.

$$ What does he mean?

$$ What can you point to in the case that illustrates his point?

$3.$ List all of the categories of ethical issues you see that occurred over the course of the events.

$4.$ Make a list of all the stakeholders in this case.

$5.$ What does the case teach us about the importance of speaking up$?$ Of raising objections? Give examples of why

people did not speak up in this case.

$6.$ What do you learn about the differences between legal and ethical conduct from this case?

$7.$ You will also need at least four peer$-$reviewed sources.