Read People v. Pratt, 656 N.W.2d 866 (2002). In Pratt, the defendant was convicted of receiving stolen property for taking and concealing his girlfriends vehicle. The defendant appealed, claiming that there was no evidence to indicate that he intended to permanently deprive his girlfriend of the vehicle, and thus it was not stolen.

Did the Court of Appeals of Michigan uphold the defendants conviction? Why or why not?

The case is available at this link: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9260508991670862336&q= actual+knowledge+%22receiving+stolen+property%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5&as_ylo=2000.

Post your thoughtful response to the question as well as your reply to TWO other students. A thoughtful response is one that is at least 500 words and your reply should at least be 125 words for each reply to your classmates