Question: Read the case excerpt ( Modisette v . Apple Inc. 3 0 Cal. App. 5 th 1 3 6 ( 2 0 1 8 )

Read the case excerpt (Modisette v. Apple Inc. 30 Cal. App. 5th 136(2018) on page 285 of the print text or the full opinion through Lexis.
Respond to the Questions about the Case. Responses must be complete sentences, spelling, and punctuation. Support your response with reference to the case (law and/or facts).
Questions:
1. What was the contention that the plaintiffs made against Apple?
-
2. What specific claims were raised in the complaint?
-
3. The court states early in the opinion that Apple did not owe a duty to the plaintiffs. Why?
-
4. There is no statute in California requiring that Apple limit its FaceTime app while a person is driving. Under other circumstances, courts have established doctrines when the legislature has failed to do so. Why didn't the court do that in this case?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!