Read the case study below and answer the question that follows:John, a homeowner, answers the telephone and listens to a solicitor make a five$-$minute sales pitch for Weed Gardening Services. John responds, No$,$ thank you, and hangs up$.$ Two days later, John returns home from work to find a crew gardening in his yard and a bill for R$2000$ sitting on the porch. When John tells the Weed representative that he never asked for this service, Weed responds by saying, It looks much better, doesnt it$?$ You got the service, now pay for it$.$ John agrees that the work was of good quality, but refuses to pay for it$.$ He is later served with a summons to appear in magistrate court because of this dispute.How should the judge rule?Hint: Use your knowledge of essential elements of a contract to answer this question.