Read the Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 and Fields v. City of Philadelphia case, 862 F.3d 353 cases and give legal analysis on:

1. HOW the court ruled and
2. WHY they ruled as they did.
3. Consider similarities, differences, and fact gaps in order to determine:
4. whether the precedent case applies.
5. why it does or does not apply.
6. exactly how it affects the outcome of Mr. Hunter Nash's case and then thoroughly discuss your findings and
7. Finaly, finish the case analysis by thoroughly applying/connecting the case law to the facts of Mr. Hunter Nash (the journalist) case to clearly establish its impact on his case.