Read the Koeppel v. Speirs case study. Based on your review of the case study, address the following:

1. The district court determined evidence of an actual, rather than attempted, intrusion was required and granted summary judgment for the defendant. However, the court of appeals reversed, finding the evidence of intrusion was sufficient to survive summary judgment. Discuss the determining factors that led to this conclusion. In responding to this topic, be sure to address any invasion of privacy laws that were referenced in their ruling.

2. Most business have some level of surveillance systems in place. Evaluate how invasion of privacy and intrusion laws impacts your practice as a Human Resources Manager.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Koeppel v Speirs Case Study Robert Speirs was an insurance agent who employed Sara Koeppel and Deanna Miller to provide him assistance in his work He wanted to monitor activities at work and thus he i... View the full answer