Read the Oregonian article "Juries raise a digital ruckus". Do you think that the jurors in this case should be commended for their willingness to seek answers to the questions that weren't answered by the attorneys and witnesses in the case, or do you feel the opposite? Why? How should courts deal with the ability that everyone now has to conduct internet research and to access social media? Tie your answer to the role of the jury in our court system. Should the traditional role change?

https://online.pcc.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=373129&type=coursefile&fileId=Articles%2fCh+02+Courts+%26+ADR%2fJuries_raise_a_digital_ruckus-Oreg_080113.pdf