read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made. My colleague responded with this "You have carefully weighed the foreseeable consequences of upholding patient confidentiality versus breaching it to warn authorities. You made societal safety a priority going so far as to betray the patient's trust. You have demonstrated a commitment to maximizing overall benefit and minimizing harm. This logic follows the classic utilitarian process, which involves considering multiple actions, evaluating their outcomes, and selecting the option with the best net results (Matthews, 2022). You have referenced legal obligations, such as the "duty to warn," which reinforces the utilitarian idea that sometimes breaking a rule (such as confidentiality) is morally justified if it prevents greater harm. Based on the resources and knowledge I have gained in this class so far, you are not reasoning like an ethical egoist, who prioritizes their self-interest, nor like a virtue ethicist, who focuses on developing moral character and acting according to virtues such as courage, honesty, or compassion. Instead, your argument aligns with utilitarianism, as it focuses on outcome-based ethical decision-making for the well-being of all parties involved