Read this case study and answer the questions A, B & C in the right column....

 

 

Transcribed Image Text:

Read this case study and answer the questions A, B & C in the right column. In the case of R. v. Elofson (14 June 1990), Yukon 89-09744 (Y.T.C.) The court had to decide whether a prison guard's actions were justified or not justified. The guard explained that he kicked the prisoner in the cell in order to "control" him. Other evidence demonstrated that the prisoner was already subdued when the guard kicked the prisoner. Circle your response. A. The guard's actions were: JUSTIFIED NOT JUSTIFIED B. CCC Section 25 (1) would provide a defense for this officer's actions. TRUE FALSE C. Briefly justify your response. Read this case study and answer the questions A, B & C in the right column. In the case of R. v. Elofson (14 June 1990), Yukon 89-09744 (Y.T.C.) The court had to decide whether a prison guard's actions were justified or not justified. The guard explained that he kicked the prisoner in the cell in order to "control" him. Other evidence demonstrated that the prisoner was already subdued when the guard kicked the prisoner. Circle your response. A. The guard's actions were: JUSTIFIED NOT JUSTIFIED B. CCC Section 25 (1) would provide a defense for this officer's actions. TRUE FALSE C. Briefly justify your response.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Based on the information provided in the image heres how you could approach the questions A The guar... View the full answer