Read this two papers and make a strong commment like i agree with you etc etc Paper #1. Jaylen crummie. I agree that a globalized labor force exploits workers in developing countries. Companies like Nike and Shein have been criticized for unsafe working conditions in their factories, such as poor ventilation and exposure to harmful chemicals. Shein, in particular, has faced allegations of forcing employees to work grueling 18-hour shifts with little rest to keep up with production demands. Additionally, weak labor rights in these regions prevent workers from unionizing or advocating for fair wages and better conditions, further highlighting the exploitation. Paper #2 Reply from Dylan Hatch Globalization, where companies hire workers in poorer countries, gives people opportunities they might not have otherwise. Sweatshops, for example, often pay better than other local jobs, like farming, which can be dangerous and unstable. Studies show that sweatshop workers in countries like Indonesia earn more than farmers, and many use the money to support their families (The Great Non-Debate over International Sweatshop Labor). In places like Bangladesh, families near factories see benefits like girls staying in school longer and avoiding early marriages (Sweatshops make poor people better off). While sweatshops can have tough working conditions, they often provide a better option than other jobs available. Countries like South Korea and Taiwan used low-wage factory work to grow their economies, eventually creating better jobs for their people (The Great Non-Debate over International Sweatshop Labor). Instead of shutting down these factories, it's better to push for small improvements in wages and working conditions while keeping these opportunities open for workers who need them most