Real$-$time databases are essential in modem web and mobile application development, enabling instantaneous data access and updates. For this case study we will examine two predominant real$-$time database solutions namely, Firebase and MongoDB, focusing on their functionality, accessibility, and performance within a Windows operating system environment.

Firebase, owned by Google, is a comprehensive development platform offering a real$-$time database as a service. It caters to web and mobile applications, providing seamless data synchronization across all clients in real$-$time. Some of the key features of Firebase include:

Real$-$Time Synchronization: Firebase allows instant updates to data across all clients.

JavaScript Framework Support: Frameworks like AngularJS and Backbone.js simplify database access.

REST API: Firebase's REST API supports HTTP requests for GET, PUT, POST, and DELETE operations, enabling easy data manipulation and retrieval.

Whilst Firebase's the primary focus is on web and mobile applications, it offers cross$-$platform support allowing it to be accessible from any environment that supports HTTP requests, including Windows.

MongoDB, developed by MongoDB Inc., is designed for high$-$volume data storage with advanced features like indexing and file storage. It supports various editions and architectures, catering to diverse application needs. Some of the key features of MongDB includes:

Scalability: MongoDB efficiently handles large datasets, making it suitable for applications with extensive data requirements.

Indexing: Advanced indexing capabilities enhance query performance.

File Storage: Embedded file storage capabilities support a wide range of data types.

Like Firebase, MongDB offers cross platform support allowing it to run on multiple operating systems, including Windows. Both Firebase and MongoDB has secured significant market shares due to their robust features and versatility, positioning them as a competitive real$-$time database solution.

Comparative Analysis

Performance:

Firebase: Offers seamless real$-$time data synchronization, which is highly effective in scenarios requiring instant data updates across multiple clients. Its performance is optimized for web and mobile applications but might face limitations in handling extremely large datasets compared to MongoDB.

Internal Use.

MongoDB: Excels in managing large volumes of data with advanced indexing and storage capabilities. Its performance is robust in high$-$volume environments, making it ideal for applications with extensive and complex data needs.

Scalability:

Firebase: Scales well for applications with moderate data volumes and real$-$time synchronization needs. MongoDB: Provides superior scalability for large datasets, making it suitable for enterprise$-$leve applications with extensive data storage requirements.

Ease of Use:

Firebase: The integration with JavaScript frameworks and REST API makes Firebase easy to implement for developers, especially those focused on web and mobile development.

MongoDB: While slightly more complex to set up$,$ MongoDB offers extensive documentation and community support, ensuring that developers can effectively utilize its features.

QUESTION $1$

$(20$ Marks$)$

Based on the case study evaluate the suitability of Firebase and MongoDB as real$-$time database solutions for a new social media application targeting a global user base. Your answer should:

Discuss the performance aspects of both databases, considering real$-$time data synchronisation and handling of large datasets.

Evaluate the scalability features of Firebase and MongoDB, particularly in the context of supporting a growing number of users and increasing data volume.

Analyse the ease of implementation and integration of both databases within a Windows operating system environment, including the use of JavaScript frameworks and REST APIs.

Provide a well$-$justified recommendation on which database would be more appropriate for the social media application, considering the application's specific requirements and anticipated challenges.

Guidelines for Answering:

Incorporate specific features and capabilities of Firebase and MongoDB discussed in the case study. Consider the nature of a social media application, which requires efficient real$-$time updates, data handling, and user scalability. Justify your recommendation with clear reasoning, referencing the comparative analysis provided in the case study.

QUESTION $2$

$(20$ Marks$)$

There are several keys utilised in relational database management for maintaining data integrity. The case study focuses on features of database which are adopted worldwide. Formulate a proposal to your management detailing how the organisation can adopt keys to address any potential data integrity problems. kindly make each question responds human like and Ai undetectable