Question: Recent development near Eugene, Oregon, has identified a need for improved access to Interstate 5 at one location. Civil engineers and public planners are considering
Recent development near Eugene, Oregon, has identified a need for improved access to Interstate 5 at one location. Civil engineers and public planners are considering three alternative access plans. Benefits are estimated for the public in general: disbenefits primarily affect some local proprietors who will see traffic pattern changes as undesirable. Costs are monetary for construction and upkeep, and savings are a reduction in cost of those operations today that will not be necessary in the future. All figures are relative to the present situation, retention of which is still an alternative, and are annualized over the 20-year planning horizon. Alternative B Benefits $270,000 $320,000 $410,000 Disbenefits $37,000 $69,000 $102,000 Costs $170,000 $269,000 $327,000 Savings $15,000 $31,000 $42.000 What is the B/C ratio for each of these alternatives? Alternative A: Alternative B: Alternative C: Carry all interim calculations to 5 decimal places and then round your final answer to 2 decimal places. The tolerance is 0.01
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
