Reconcile the most appropriate design pattern from a range with a series of given scenerios?(I want full and complete answer)

Anx C 1: scario 1: The given scenario shows a class being instantiated via sequence diagram. Reconcile the appropriate design patterns and state its category. Also mention errors in given scenario (If Any) aClient create aConcrete 1 1 I create a Director 1 Construct() BulldPart() BulldPart() BulldPartCO) GetResult() Scenario 2: The given scenario shows two classes in aggregation relationship with concrete implement operations. Reconcile the appropriate design patterns and state its category. Also mention errors in given scenario (If Any) Client imp Abstraction Implementor aggregation Operation() OperationImpo imp->OperationImpo RefinedAbstraction ConcretelmplementorB ConcretelmplementorA OperationImpo OperationImpo 3 lario 3: Tlven scenario shows a class and sequence diagram of a client class with a interface class Serations. Reconcile the appropriate design patterns and state its category. Also mention errors given scenario (If Any) interfaces tortice Aggregate ? Client Aggregate1 Client ? next() hasNext() create create new ? return while hasNext( 1 nexto Aggregate 1 return element create) createIterator next() hasNext() ? Scenario 4: The given scenario shows different classes in a relationship with certain operative information. Reconcile the appropriate design patterns and state its category. Also mention errors in given scenario (If Any) > IPerson University + Clone(): 1Person Student Teacher * + Clone(): IPerson Clone(): IPerson return new Student(). retum new Teacher(); cenario 5: The given scenario shows classes and sub classes in certain relationships with attributes and operations. Reconcile the appropriate design patterns and state its category. Also mention errors in given scenario (If Any) Graphic Drawo Add(Graphic) Remove(Graphic) GetChild(int) Line Rectangle Text Picture Drawo Drawo Drawo graphics Operation Add(Graphic g) Remove(Graphic) GetChild(int) dibawa