Red Deer and Camrose.

$6$

$\backslash$table$[[$Factor$,$Weight,Red Deer,Camrose$],[$Incentive$,0\mathrm{.}45,85,65],[$Player satisfaction,$0\mathrm{.}30,25,45],[$Sports interest,$0\mathrm{.}20,45,95],[$Size of city,$0\mathrm{.}05,75,35]]$

a$)$ Based on the given information, the best location for the Warriors to relocate to is

with the weighted score of

$($Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.$)$

b$)$ Camrose just raised its incentive package, and the new score is $85.$ Why doesn't this impact your decision in part $($a$)?$

A$.$ Even if the score is $85,$ Camrose will stay as the second choice.

B$.$ Even if the score is $85,$ Camrose's total weighted score drops to $64,$ just ahead of Red Deer.

C$.$ Because Camrose is already the better site.