Regarding assigned case EBWS, LLC v$.$ Britly Corp., $928$ A$\mathrm{.}2$d $497($Vt$.2007)$:

Surely it is well known in Vermont dairy country that dairy farmers can't simply stop milking cows when no processing plant is available to take the milk$-$the cows will soon stop producing.

Why was EBWS then not entitled to those damages which it will certainly suffer when the creamery is down for repairs?

Because those damages were not a foreseeable consequence of a breach.

Because those damages were not contemplated by both of the parties at the time of contracting.

All of these answer choices are correct

Because those losses were a voluntary expense.