Regarding assigned case Holly Hill Acres, Ltd$.$ v$.$ Charter Bank of Gainesville, $314$ So$\mathrm{.}2$d $209($Fla$.$ App. $1975)$: What was wrong with the promissory note that made it nonnegotiable? The note contained an unconditional promise to pay as required by the UCC. The note was given with a mortgage as a security interest to the Bank. The note did not contain an unconditional promise to pay as required by the UCC. O Promissory notes are not assignable.Regarding assigned case First Investment Co$.$ v$.$ Anderson, $621$ P$\mathrm{.}2$d $683($Utah $1980)$: What words are missing from these notes that would have changed the result of this case? O "Pay to the order" O "Pay to the order of the payee" All of these answer choices are correct. O "Pay to the bearer"