Question: Regarding evidence admissibility, what does hearsay mean? Without exception, second - hand evidence is not admissible Second - hand evidence is usually not admissible; however,

Regarding evidence admissibility, what does hearsay mean?
Without exception, second-hand evidence is not admissible
Second-hand evidence is usually not admissible; however, there is an exception regarding business records
Testimony regarding information provided by someone other than a witness is not admissible unless the second-hand person has granted permission to use the evidence
When testifying under oath, and expert can describe what he or she has heard others say

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Programming Questions!

Q:

1.What were the exceptions to the hearsay rule that the court used? 2. Why does the court say that in some instances it is not necessary to examine the trustworthiness of the surveys before...

Q:

3/21/24, 12:22 AM United States v. Nixon :: 418 U.S. 683 (1974) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center JUSTIA Argued: Decided: July 8, 1974 July 24, 1974 Annotation PRIMARY HOLDING The President cannot...

Q:

Schering v. Pfizer, Inc. 189 F.3d 218 (2d Cir. 1999) This appeal invites us to revisit an increasingly important issue in the law of evidence, and one that has confused many courts. Today we clarify...

Q:

FORENSIC 1 - FORENSIC PHOTOGRAPHY Draft a reaction paper for each of the two case digests/summaries in the image. focusing on the photographic evidence that helped the case succeed. Please follow...

Q:

how would i write a case brief> using a random case i attached what would a case breif for this look like? IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REGINA v. DAMIAN SOROCZYNSKI PUBLICATION BAN...

Q:

This week we read Rico v. Mitsubishi. Provide an analysis of this case. Also, Why was confidentiality the focus of this case? Which facts led to the allegations? Did you agree or disagree with the...

Q:

Yourquestion: Subject:LawCourse:Add In Regards to the case provided below, what was the nature of the document at issue? who prepared it? what was it to be used for? what was the role of the...

Q:

Yourquestion: Subject:LawCourse:Add In Regards to the case provided below, what was the nature of the document at issue? who prepared it? what was it to be used for? what was the role of the...

Q:

In Regards to the case provided below, what was the nature of the document at issue? who prepared it? what was it to be used for? what was the role of the paralegal in preparing this document? was...

Q:

1. Read the articleSix Impossible Things Before Breakfast. Is the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) the correct theory relative well functioning financial markets? If not why not? 2.Read the...

Q:

In Problems 95 and 96, evaluate each expression on a calculator and determine which pairs have the same value. Verify these results algebraically. (A) 2 32 +5 (B)8 (C)3 + 7 (D)3 +8 +3- 8 (E)10 +84...

Q:

Consider the function f(x) = x f(x) is f(x) is f(0) = f(4) = 4x + 2 on the interval [0, 4]. Verify that this function satisfies the three hypotheses of Rolle's Theorem on the inverval. on [0, 4]: on...

Q:

An example of rebating would be: A . Reducing the premiums across the board for a specific risk class B . A mutual insurance company paying dividends to its policyowners C . Splitting commissions...

Q:

A project being analyzed by PERT has 55 activities, 8 of which are on the critical path. If the estimated time along the critical path is 125 days with a project standard deviation of 15 days, find th